🔗 Share this article

US prosecutors have stated that a Libyan individual freely confessed to being involved in operations targeting American targets, including the 1988's Lockerbie incident and an failed attempt to kill a US public figure using a rigged garment.

Statement Details

Abu Agila Mas'ud Kheir al-Marimi is alleged to have acknowledged his participation in the deaths of 270 people when Flight 103 was destroyed over the Scottish area of Lockerbie, during interrogation in a Libyan holding center in the year 2012.

Known as Mas'ud, the senior individual has claimed that several disguised persons compelled him to deliver the statement after intimidating him and his loved ones.

His attorneys are working to stop it from being utilized as testimony in his trial in DC in the coming year.

Judicial Conflict

In answer, attorneys from the US Department of Justice have stated they can demonstrate in court that the statement was "willing, credible and truthful."

The presence of the defendant's claimed statement was first disclosed in 2020, when the American authorities stated it was charging him with constructing and activating the explosive device employed on the aircraft.

Defense Assertions

The defendant is accused of being a former official in Libya's intelligence agency and has been in American detention since recent years.

He has entered innocent to the accusations and is expected to appear in court at the federal court for the Washington DC in the coming months.

The defendant's attorneys are trying to prevent the jury from hearing about the confession and have filed a request asking for it to be withheld.

They argue it was acquired under pressure following the uprising which removed the Libyan leader in 2011.

Claimed Coercion

They say ex- personnel of the dictator's administration were being victimized with unlawful killings, abductions and torture when the suspect was seized from his residence by weapon-carrying persons the subsequent period.

He was transported to an unregistered holding location where additional prisoners were reportedly abused and mistreated and was alone in a small cell when several masked men handed him a solitary page of paper.

His lawyers stated its handwritten contents began with an order that he was to acknowledge to the Pan Am Flight 103 incident and a separate terror attack.

Substantial Terror Incidents

The defendant asserts he was ordered to remember what it indicated about the incidents and repeat it when he was questioned by another person the next day.

Fearing for his security and that of his offspring, he claimed he thought he had no option but to acquiesce.

In their response to the defendant's request, legal counsel from the US Department of Justice have declared the court was being asked to withhold "highly relevant evidence" of Mas'ud's responsibility in "multiple major terror events targeting US citizens."

Government Counterarguments

They claim the suspect's account of incidents is unconvincing and untrue, and assert that the details of the admission can be corroborated by trustworthy separate proof gathered over numerous years.

The government attorneys state the suspect and additional former officials of the dictator's secret service were kept in a secret detention facility operated by a armed group when they were interviewed by an knowledgeable Libyan police officer.

They argue that in the chaos of the aftermath era, the facility was "the most secure environment" for Mas'ud and the other agents, considering the conflict and resistance sentiment widespread at the period.

Questioning Particulars

Based to the police officer who interrogated the defendant, the facility was "well run", the detainees were not restrained and there were no evidence of torture or coercion.

The official has said that over multiple sessions, a self-assured and healthy Mas'ud detailed his involvement in the explosions of the aircraft.

The federal authorities has also asserted he had confessed constructing a bomb which went off in a German venue in the mid-1980s, causing the deaths of three individuals, including multiple US servicemen, and harming many additional.

Further Accusations

He is also said to have detailed his role in an plot on the lives of an unidentified US diplomatic official at a official ceremony in the Asian country.

The defendant is alleged to have explained that someone with the US figure was carrying a explosive-laden coat.

It was the defendant's task to detonate the device but he chose not to act after learning that the individual carrying the garment did not understand he was on a suicide mission.

He chose "not to trigger the button" despite his superior in the intelligence service being alongside at the period and inquiring what was {going on|happening|occurring